Fix the cloud controls behind your failing security review
SOC 2, Vanta/Drata/Secureframe, and customer security reviews surface the gaps. I implement the fixes — IAM, audit logging, GitHub/CI/CD controls, vulnerability scanning, backups — and hand back the merged changes plus evidence packaged for buyer and auditor review.
15-minute fit call · clear yes or no · the engineer who ships the fixescontrols-review · acme-corp.report
| Finding | System | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| Admin access lacks MFA evidence | AWS · IAM | High |
| Cloud audit logs not retained for review period | GCP · Logging | High |
| No deploy approval evidence for production | GitHub · CI | Medium |
| AI feature has no token spend guardrail | Vertex AI | Medium |
Admin access lacks MFA evidence
AWS · IAM
Cloud audit logs not retained for review period
GCP · Logging
No deploy approval evidence for production
GitHub · CI
AI feature has no token spend guardrail
Vertex AI
An enterprise security questionnaire is blocking a deal
A SOC 2 / audit-readiness assessment found gaps
Vanta / Drata / Secureframe is showing failing checks
A customer is asking for cloud-controls evidence
The controls behind the failing checks
I do the engineering that usually falls outside a readiness assessment or a compliance platform — and hand back the evidence.
Identity & access (IAM)
MFA enforcement, least-privilege roles, removing standing admin, access reviews.
Audit logging
Logging enabled across clouds, retention set and locked, sinks and alerts wired.
GitHub / GitLab CI/CD
Branch protection, required reviews and status checks, deploy approvals.
Vulnerability & secret scanning
Dependency, secret, and image scanning turned on and enforced in CI.
Backups & recovery
Backup configuration plus a real, documented restore test.
Evidence packaging
Each fix comes with a sanitized, buyer-ready evidence artifact and a matching row in the evidence register.
Not an auditor — the engineer.
This is fixed-scope engineering implementation, not an audit, attestation, legal opinion, or penetration test. Your auditor or compliance platform tells you what is failing; I close the technical gaps and produce the evidence. Where a CPA firm is involved, they retain independence over anything they attest.
A 48-hour Controls Review, then a clear decision
The first 48 hours are a read-only review of the selected cloud, repo, CI/CD, logging, and compliance-platform evidence. You get:
- Prioritized findings — severity, affected system, and the specific evidence a buyer or auditor asks for.
- An implementation plan for each finding, with an effort estimate.
- A clear yes/no on whether fixed-scope remediation can close them.
Get a clear yes or no in 15 minutes
If you’d rather not book, email a redacted gap list instead. You’ll get the same fit assessment.